4.5 Article

Modeling and Optimal Design of Machining-Induced Residual Stresses in Aluminium Alloys Using a Fast Hierarchical Multiobjective Optimization Algorithm

Journal

MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 508-520

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2010.537421

Keywords

Aluminum alloy; Data-driven modelling; Fuzzy system; Multi-objective optimization; Residual stress

Funding

  1. European Union under the Framework 6 initiative
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F023464/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/F023464/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The residual stresses induced during shaping and machining play an important role in determining the integrity and durability of metal components. An important issue of producing safety critical components is to find the machining parameters that create compressive surface stresses or to minimize tensile surface stresses. In this article, a systematic data-driven fuzzy modeling methodology is proposed, which allows constructing transparent fuzzy models considering both accuracy and interpretability attributes of fuzzy systems. The new method employs a hierarchical optimization structure to improve the modeling efficiency, where two learning mechanisms cooperate together: the Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is used to improve the model's structure, while the gradient descent method is used to optimize the numerical parameters. This hybrid approach is then successfully applied to the problem that concerns the prediction of machining induced residual stresses in aerospace aluminium alloys. Based on the developed reliable prediction models, NSGA-II is further applied to the multiobjective optimal design of aluminium alloys in a oreverse-engineeringo fashion. It is revealed that the optimal machining regimes to minimize the residual stress and the machining cost simultaneously can be successfully located.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available