4.4 Article

Measuring the corrosion rate of steel in concrete - effect of measurement technique, polarisation time and current

Journal

MATERIALS AND CORROSION-WERKSTOFFE UND KORROSION
Volume 63, Issue 3, Pages 200-214

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/maco.201005792

Keywords

corrosion current density; corrosion rate; galvanostatic; polarisation resistance; potentiodynamic; reinforced concrete; reinforcement corrosion

Funding

  1. FORCE Technology A/S
  2. Danish Academy of Technical Sciences'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both on-site investigations and laboratory studies have shown that different corrosion rates are obtained when different commercially available corrosion rate instruments are used. The different electrochemical techniques and the measurement parameters used, i.e. polarisation current and time, are in some studies considered the main reasons for the variations. This paper presents an experimental study on the quantitative effect of polarisation time and current on the measured polarisation resistance and thus the corrosion current density of passively and actively corroding steel. Two electrochemical techniques often used in instruments for on-site corrosion rate measurements are investigated. On passively corroding reinforcement the measured polarisation resistance was for both techniques found to be highly affected by the polarisation time and current and no plateaus at either short or long polarisation times, or low or high polarisation currents were identified. On actively corroding reinforcement a large effect of the polarisation time was also found, but only a minor effect of the polarisation current. The effect of the polarisation time was, however, practically independent of the corrosion rate for actively corroding steel. For both techniques guidelines for polarisation times and currents are given for (on-site) non-destructive corrosion rate measurements on reinforcement steel in concrete.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available