4.7 Article

Fatigue strength of notched specimens made of 40CrMoV13.9 under multiaxial loading

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 54, Issue -, Pages 57-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.08.013

Keywords

Multiaxial fatigue; Strain energy density; Notched components; Non-proportional loading

Funding

  1. Italian Research Program entitled Static and fatigue behaviour of structural notched components subjected to tension and torsion under small or large scale yielding [CPDA100715]
  2. PRIN project [2009Z55NWC_001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The work deals with multiaxial fatigue strength of notched round bars made of 40CrMoV13.9 steel and tested under combined tension and torsion loading, both in-phase and out-of-phase. The axis-symmetric V-notches present a constant notch root radius, 1 mm, and a notch opening angle of 90 degrees; the notch root radius is equal to 4 mm in the semi-circular notches where the strength in the high cycle fatigue regime is usually controlled by the theoretical stress concentration factor, being the notch root radius large enough to result in a notch sensitivity index equals to unity. In both geometries the diameter of the net transverse area is 12 mm. The results from multi-axial tests are discussed together with those obtained under pure tension and pure torsion loading from notched specimens with the same geometry. Altogether more than 120 new fatigue data are summarised in the present work, corresponding to a one-year of testing programme. All fatigue data are presented first in terms of nominal stress amplitudes referred to the net area and then re-analysed in terms of the mean value of the strain energy density evaluated over a given, crescent shape volume embracing the stress concentration region. For the specific steel, the radius of the control volume is found to be independent of the loading mode. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available