4.7 Article

Separating nano graphene oxide from the residual strong-acid filtrate of the modified Hummers method with alkaline solution

Journal

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages 83-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.110

Keywords

Graphene oxide; Alkaline solution; Flocculation; Acid base interaction

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [51262012]
  2. Foundation of Jiangxi Science and Technology Committee [20133ACB20007, 20114BAB206022]
  3. Key Laboratory of Inorganic Coating Materials, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KLICM-2014-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the modified Hummers method for preparing graphene oxide, the yellow slurry can be obtained. After filtering through a quantitative filter paper, the strong-acid filtrate containing the unprecipitated nano graphene oxide was gained. The corresponding filtrate was added gradually with an alkaline (NaOH or KOH) solution at room temperature. The unprecipitated nano graphene oxide could undergo fast aggregation when the pH value of the filtrate was about 1.7 and formed the stable floccules. X-ray diffraction analysis shows the dominant peak of the floccules is about 11 degrees, which accords to the peak of graphene oxide. Spectra of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirm the presence in the floccules of an abundance of oxygen functional groups and the purified graphene oxide floccules can be obtained. Atomic force microscopy measurement shows the graphene oxide floccules consists of sheet-like objects, mostly containing only a few layers (about 5 layers). Zeta potential analysis demonstrates the surface charge of the graphene oxide is pH-sensitive and its isoelectric point is similar to 1.7. The flocculation mechanism of graphene oxide ascribes to the acid-base interaction with the surface functional groups of the carbon layers. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available