4.7 Article

Multi-scale design of composite materials and structures for maximum natural frequencies

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 51, Issue -, Pages 1023-1034

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.014

Keywords

Topology optimization; Inverse homogenization; Composite design; Periodic structure; Concurrent design

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [DP1094401]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51228801]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP1094401] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a hierarchical concurrent design approach to maximizing the natural frequency of a structure. Multiple material phases are considered in the topology optimization performed on both the macro and micro scales. A general problem for composite structure and material design is formulated that contains the cellular design problem as a special case. The design of the macro structure and material micro structure is coupled. The designed material properties are applied to the analysis of the macro structure, while the macro structure displacement field is considered in the sensitivity analysis on the micro scale. The material edistribution is controlled by an optimality criterion for frequency maximization. Convergent and mesh-independent bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) algorithms are employed to obtain the final optimal solution. Several numerical examples of composite structures and materials are presented to demonstrate the capability and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Results include various orthotropic or anisotropic composite materials, as well as vibration-resisting layouts of the macro structure. In-depth discussions are also given on the effects of the base material phases and the assignment of the volume fractions on each scale. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available