4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on the ballistic resistance of monolithic and multi-layered plates against hemispherical-nosed projectiles impact

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 266-281

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.021

Keywords

Perforation; Layered target; Ballistic limit; Failure model; Deformation mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the ballistic behavior of single, double-, three-, four-and six-layered plates impacted by hemispherical-nosed projectiles were experimentally investigated. Ballistic limit velocity for each multi-layered target was obtained based on the investigation of the effect of the air gap between layers, the number, order and thickness of layers on the ballistic resistance. The results showed that the monolithic thin targets presented more effective than multi-layered targets when the dominant response of monolithic targets were dishing and bulging which involved bending and stretching, and the ballistic limit velocities of multi-layered plates increased with the increase of the number of layers, although the multi-layered targets were less effective than monolithic targets. However, the monolithic targets had lower ballistic resistance than multi-layered targets if the total thickness above a specific value, the dominant target response changed from shearing to bulging and dishing when using multi-layered targets instead of monolithic targets. Moreover, the air gap decreased the ballistic resistance of multi-layered targets, but the air gap size had slight influence on the ballistic resistance. The order of layers affected the ballistic resistance of multi-layered targets, the multi-layered targets of two equal thick plates had the highest ballistic resistance followed by multi-layered targets of a thicker front plate and a thinner back plate, multi-layered targets of a thinner front plate and a thicker back plate. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available