4.7 Article

Analysis, manufacture and characterization of Ni/Cu functionally graded structures

Journal

MATERIALS & DESIGN
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages 255-265

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.04.038

Keywords

Functionally graded structures; Spark plasma sintering; Nickel/copper gradation

Funding

  1. FAPESP (Sao Paulo State Foundation Research Agency) [05/01762-5]
  2. USA National Science Foundation (NSF)
  3. CNPq (National Council for Research and Development, Brazil) [303689/2009-9]
  4. FAPESP [2011/02387-4]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [05/01762-5] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, an experimental and numerical analysis and characterization of functionally graded structures (FGSs) is developed. Nickel (Ni) and copper (Cu) materials are used as basic materials in the numerical modeling and experimental characterization. For modeling, a MATLAB finite element code is developed, which allows simulation of harmonic and modal analysis considering the graded finite element formulation. For experimental characterization, Ni-Cu FGSs are manufactured by using spark plasma sintering technique. Hardness and Young's modulus are found by using microindentation and ultrasonic measurements, respectively. The effective gradation of Ni/Cu FGS is addressed by means of optical microscopy, energy dispersive spectrometry, scanning electron microscopy and hardness testing. For the purpose of comparing modeling and experimental results, the hardness curve, along the gradation direction, is used for identifying the gradation profile; accordingly, the experimental hardness curve is used for approximating the Young's modulus variation and the graded finite element modeling is used for verification. For the first two resonance frequency values, a difference smaller than 1% between simulated and experimental results is obtained. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available