4.3 Article

Foraging habits in a generalist predator: Sex and age influence habitat selection and resource use among bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus)

Journal

MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 155-168

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mms.12143

Keywords

bottlenose dolphin; Tursiops truncatus; stable isotopes; foraging ecology; habitat use; diet; individual specialization; generalist; Sarasota Bay

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [0802267]
  2. Marine Mammal Commission [E4047334]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines resource use (diet, habitat use, and trophic level) within and among demographic groups (males, females, and juveniles) of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). We analyzed the C-13 and N-15 values of 15 prey species constituting 84% of the species found in stomach contents. We used these data to establish a trophic enrichment factor (TEF) to inform dietary analysis using a Bayesian isotope mixing model. We document a TEF of 0 parts per thousand and 2.0 parts per thousand for C-13 and N-15, respectively. The dietary results showed that all demographic groups relied heavily on low trophic level seagrass-associated prey. Bayesian standard ellipse areas (SEA(b)) were calculated to assess diversity in resource use. The SEA(b) of females was nearly four times larger than that of males indicating varied resource use, likely a consequence of small home ranges and habitat specialization. Juveniles possessed an intermediate SEA(b), generally feeding at a lower trophic level compared to females, potentially an effect of natal philopatry and immature foraging skills. The small SEA(b) of males reflects a high degree of specialization on seagrass associated prey. Patterns in resource use by the demographic groups are likely linked to differences in the relative importance of social and ecological factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available