4.5 Article

Evolution and development of Miocene island dolostones on Xisha Islands, South China Sea

Journal

MARINE GEOLOGY
Volume 406, Issue -, Pages 142-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2018.09.006

Keywords

Island dolomite; Dolomitization; Sea-level change; Cenozoic; Xisha Islands

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91428203]
  2. Science and Technology Project of Guangxi [AD17129063, AA17204074]
  3. BaGui Fellowship from Guangxi Province, Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Project [2014BGXZGX03]
  4. Guangxi Youth Science Fund Project [2017GXNSFBA198242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

On Xisha Islands, located in the South China Sea, the Neogene succession includes the unconformity-bounded Huangliu Formation that is 210.5 m thick in well CK-2 and formed almost entirely of dolostones. The diverse biota in the Huangliu Formation, which includes corals, algae, bivalves and foraminifera, indicates that the original carbonate sediments accumulated in water that was < 30 m deep. The dolostones are formed of various mixtures of low- and high-calcium calcian dolomite with limpid dolomite lining the walls of many cavities. The O-18 and C-13 stable isotopes suggest that dolomitization was mediated by slightly modified seawater. The Sr-87/Sr-86 ratios from the dolostones suggest that dolomitization took place similar to 9.4 and 2.3 Ma ago, with the age of dolomitization becoming progressively younger towards the top of the formation. Island dolostones like these, found on many islands throughout the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea, have commonly been linked to eustatic changes in sea-level with dolomitization taking place during lowstands, highstands, or transgressive phases. Data from the Huangliu Formation in well CK-2 suggests that dolomitization was associated with (semi-) continuous transgressive conditions that were controlled by the interaction of tectonic subsidence and eustatic changes in sea level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available