4.5 Article

Process-based 2DH morphodynamic modeling of tidal inlets: A comparison with empirical classifications and theories

Journal

MARINE GEOLOGY
Volume 291, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2011.10.001

Keywords

tidal inlet classification; inlet morphodynamics; morphodynamic modeling; empirical models

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia
  2. Programa Operacional Ciencia, Tecnologia, Inovacao
  3. FEDER
  4. DETI - Dynamics of Ephemeral Tidal Inlets [PTDC/MAR/65585/2006, PTDC/ECM/103801/2008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The economical and ecological importance of tidal inlets has fostered the development of empirical tools for inlet management during the last century. This study aims at confronting these empirical theories with results obtained with a process-based numerical model, MORSYS2D. This 2DH morphodynamic modeling system is applied to an idealized tidal inlet/lagoon system with different combinations of significant wave height, tidal range and tidal prism. The numerical model predictions are compared to the empirical models of Hayes, Bruun, O'Brien and FitzGerald and to morphologies observed at natural tidal inlets. The results present good accordance with observations as well as with some key behaviors predicted with the empirical theories. The predicted morphologies satisfy the relation of O'Brien between the tidal prism and the cross-sectional area, the model reproduces the conceptual model of sand by-passing by ebb-tidal delta breaching of FitzGerald and the classifications of Hayes and Bruun are generally respected. However, some inconsistencies between model results and Hayes classification highlight the limitations of applying this classification, which only considers the yearly-averaged significant wave height and tidal range, to a single tidal inlet case. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available