Journal
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 511, Issue -, Pages 105-116Publisher
INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps10953
Keywords
Crustacea; Decapoda; Dead coral; Coral rubble; Biomass; Productivity
Categories
Funding
- Australian Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Benthic crustaceans are an important component of the coral reef fauna, yet our understanding of their ecological significance is incomplete. To determine the community structure, abundance, biomass and productivity of benthic Crustacea at Lizard Island, a mid-shelf reef on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia, we investigated 5 major microhabitats: dead coral, coral rubble, sand, epilithic algal matrix (EAM) and fine-branching live coral. Crustacean communities differed significantly among habitats, with the exception of dead coral and coral rubble. Dead coral was the most important microhabitat type in terms of crustacean abundance (7838 +/- 628 ind. 100 cm(-2), mean +/- SE), biomass (0.75 +/- 0.13 g m(-2), wet weight) and estimated productivity (0.17 +/- 0.043 g 100 cm(-2) yr(-1) ash free dry weight). These values were 2 to 3 orders of magnitude greater than those for the least important habitats (EAM and fine-branching live coral). Despite their abundance, the average crustacean body length was just 0.79 +/- 0.32 mm, largely due to the dominance of harpacticoid copepods. In contrast, decapods exhibited very low abundances, but yielded the greatest biomass and productivity and were particularly abundant in dead coral and coral rubble. The results highlight the importance of small crustaceans and dead coral micro habitats as valuable contributors to the trophic structure of coral reefs.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available