4.2 Article

Influence of tides on assemblages and behaviour of fishes associated with shallow seagrass edges and bare sand

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 456, Issue -, Pages 187-199

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09695

Keywords

Underwater video; Water depth; Estuary; Fish movements; Zostera capensis; South Africa

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF)
  2. South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seagrass beds and associated fish assemblages have been the focus of a large number of past studies. However, the influence of small water depth changes due to tides on fish species along shallow seagrass bed edges is unknown. In this study an underwater video camera was deployed to examine the fish community at 3 seagrass edge (Zostera capensis) and 3 sand sites over incoming spring and neap tides in the Bushmans Estuary, South Africa. Small changes in tidally driven water depth had significant effects on the abundance of common fish taxa, with gobies decreasing and others, including mullets, increasing in abundance. These general patterns were consistent in both seagrass and sand sites, as well as during spring and neap tidal cycles. There were inconsistent differences in the abundance of common fish taxa between seagrass edges and bare sand. Importantly, when differences did occur, these were contingent on tidal stage or linked to different tidal cycles (neap or spring), highlighting that small changes in depth may influence edge effects. The behaviour of fish did not appear to be influenced by water depth, but for some taxa there were distinct differences in swimming behaviour between those individuals associated with seagrass beds and those situated over bare sand. These small temporal scale changes in water depth are a previously overlooked aspect of littoral seagrass landscapes that may be important in structuring associated fish communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available