4.2 Article

Symbiodinium spp. in colonies of eastern Pacific Pocillopora spp. are highly stable despite the prevalence of low-abundance background populations

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 462, Issue -, Pages 1-7

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09914

Keywords

Coral bleaching; Real-time PCR; Symbiodinium; Symbiosis; Pocillopora; Eastern Pacific

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOB 544765, IOB 544854]
  2. University of Delaware
  3. Pennsylvania State University
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences [0825413] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A shift in the dominant Symbiodinium species within a coral colony may allow rapid acclimatization to environmental stress, provided that the new symbiont is better suited to prevailing conditions. In this study, the Symbiodinium diversity in Pocillopora corals was examined following a cold-water bleaching event in the Gulf of California. Individual colonies were differentially impacted by this event based upon their association with either the Symbiodinium ITS-2 type C1b-c (sensitive) or ITS-2 type D1 (tolerant). Real-time PCR indicated a high prevalence of an alternate and compatible Symbiodinium sp. (i.e. C1b-c or D1) residing at low-abundance background levels within many colonies both during and after a 1 yr recovery interval (46 to 52%). However, despite the potential for 'switching,' the dominant resident symbiont remained at high abundance during the recovery, with only 2 of 67 colonies (3%) under-going a change to the other Symbiodinium type. Pocillopora residing in the Gulf of California therefore maintain long-term associations dominated by a specific Symbiodinium sp., where potential competition by a second symbiont type is suppressed despite the temporary change in environmental conditions that would favor a shift in symbiosis toward a more stress-tolerant species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available