4.2 Article

Cannibalism among size classes of larvae may be a substantial mortality component in tuna

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 433, Issue -, Pages 205-219

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09187

Keywords

Cannibalism; Foraging model; Intraspecific predation; Natural mortality; Pelagic larvae; Predator-prey interactions; Size spectra; Surf-riding

Funding

  1. project BALEARES [CTM 2009-07944 MAR]
  2. project TUNIBAL [REN 2003-01176]
  3. EUR-OCEANS scholarship
  4. University of Bergen/Norwegian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cannibalism among size classes may reduce starvation and improve survival of larval tuna in oligotrophic ocean areas, but it may also be a substantial mortality component depending on the availability of alternative prey. Here, we combine laboratory and field data on tuna larvae with a model of larval foraging and bioenergetics to explore the role of cannibalism in cohort development at different temperatures, durations of hatching period, hatching larval densities and natural mortality rates. Prey fields (zooplankton densities and co-occurrence of different larval stages of 3 species of tuna) were established from cruises in a main tuna spawning area around the Balearic Islands (Mediterranean Sea). Results suggest that a pure zooplankton diet is frequently insufficient to sustain larval growth. Piscivory can be a major source of larval mortality among tuna species and larvae hatched early can feed on abundant larvae of smaller size and have fewer predators themselves. We show how the intensity of cannibalism depends on the temperature dependent growth rate and the resulting relative size distribution when eggs are released continuously over a period of a few weeks. The predator-prey size distribution and the relative densities of these voracious larvae may produce overcompensation in recruitment under some environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available