4.2 Article

Carbon stable isotope discrimination during respiration in three seaweed species

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 437, Issue -, Pages 41-49

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps09300

Keywords

C-13; Fractionation; Macroalgae; Respiration; Respiratory quotient; Short-term incubation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP0878683, LE0668495]
  2. Australian Research Council [LE0668495, DP0878683] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Very little is known about seaweed stable carbon isotope discrimination during respiration (Delta(r), defined here as the difference between respired CO2 delta C-13 and algal tissue delta C-13). However, Delta(r) can give information on carbon metabolic pathways in seaweeds, and can also be helpful to better understand their role in carbon cycling. Here we measured the Delta(r) of Ulva sp. (Chlorophyta), Pterocladia capillacea Bornet (Rhodophyta) and Sargassum sp. (Ochrophyta) under 3 different experimental conditions: at 15 and 25 degrees C after strong illumination for 30 to 60 min, and at 25 degrees C after at least 20 h in the dark. We observed a correlation between Delta(r) and the respiratory quotient (RQ, defined as the ratio between CO2 release and O-2 consumption), suggesting changes in the organic substrate used for respiration in the different treatments. Delta(r) was positive in most cases, suggesting that carbohydrates were the likely substrate for respiration; however, Delta(r) (and the RQ) decreased with an increase in temperature, suggesting increased use of lipids as substrates. Although Delta(r) was not large (averaging 3 parts per thousand), the influence of seaweed respiration on the delta C-13 of dissolved inorganic carbon may need to be taken into account in ecosystems where seaweeds dominate primary production (i.e. eutrophic lagoons). Delta(r) may also be important when interpreting seaweed delta C-13 values to determine the form of inorganic carbon used in photosynthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available