4.2 Article

Influence of trophic position and foraging range on mercury levels within a seabird community

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 375, Issue -, Pages 277-288

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps07784

Keywords

Mercury; Procellariiformes; delta N-15; delta C-13; Trophic position; Diet; Seabird

Funding

  1. Department of Employment and Learning
  2. NERC Life Sciences Stable Isotope Facility
  3. NERC [bas010017, lsmsf010002] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [lsmsf010002, bas010017, ceh010023] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seabirds are often advocated as biomonitors for marine contaminants such as mercury (Hg). However, contaminant levels can vary widely depending on among-individual and among-species variation in foraging preferences and physiology, and on tissue types used for analyses. Using stable isotope analysis (SIA), we investigated the effects of trophic position, season, and tissue type on Hg burdens in a group of 10 closely related seabirds (Procellariiformes) from a single colony in the South Atlantic. Analysis of blood (reflecting breeding season diet) showed that among-species Hg concentrations varied as a function of trophic position (delta N-15) and were also influenced to a lesser degree by foraging range (delta C-13). This pattern did not hold for feathers, which reflect the non-breeding period. Mercury levels in feathers formed during the non-breeding season appear to be more strongly governed by species effects (such as moult schedule), demonstrating the need to carefully consider tissue type when formulating predictions regarding Hg burdens and dynamics. Assessment at a community rather than the species level, and across a number of tissue types, provided a more complete picture of the complex interactions between Hg and foraging ecology in seabirds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available