4.2 Article

Early egg traits in Cancer setosus (Decapoda, Brachyura): effects of temperature and female size

Journal

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
Volume 377, Issue -, Pages 193-202

Publisher

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps07845

Keywords

Crustacea; Cancridae; Chile; Latitudinal cline; Reproductive plasticity

Funding

  1. DAAD-scholarship
  2. EU-project CENSOR (Climate variability and El Nino Southern Oscillation: Implications [511071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous study on Cancer setosus Molina, 1782 showed that latitudinal changes in temperature control the number of annual egg masses. This study focused on the effects of pre-oviposition temperature and female size on egg traits in C. setosus from northern (Antofagasta, 23 degrees S) and central-southern (Puerto Montt, 41 degrees S) Chile. Blastula eggs produced in nature ranged in dry mass (DM) from 9.1 to 15.1 mu g, in carbon (C) from 4.8 to 8.4 mu g, in nitrogen (N) from 1.0 to 1.6 mu g, in C:N ratio between 4.7 and 5.4, and in volume (V) between 152 and 276 mm(3) X 10(-4) per female. Blastula eggs from females caught early in the reproductive season in Puerto Montt (September 2006) were significantly higher in DM, C, N, and V than those of females caught 2 mo later, reflecting a seasonal increase in water temperature. In Puerto Montt 'early' and 'late' season blastula eggs were higher in DM, C, N, and V than eggs from Antofagasta by about 32 and 20%, respectively. Subsequent egg masses produced in captivity in Puerto Montt followed this pattern of smaller eggs with lower DM, C, and N content at higher pre-oviposition temperatures. In Antofagasta no significant difference in DM, C, N, and V between eggs produced in nature and subsequent eggs produced in captivity was found and all egg traits were significantly positively affected by maternal size. Reproductive plasticity in C, setosus helps to explain the species wide latitudinal distribution range.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available