4.8 Review

Geothermal energy for sustainable development: A review of sustainability impacts and assessment frameworks

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 44, Issue -, Pages 391-406

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.020

Keywords

Geothermal energy; Sustainability; Sustainability indicators

Funding

  1. GEORG geothermal cluster
  2. Orkustofnun (National Energy Authority of Iceland)
  3. Landsvirkjun Power
  4. RANNIS (Icelandic Research Fund)
  5. University of Iceland
  6. University of Auckland
  7. Reykajvik Energy (Orkuveita Reykjavikur)
  8. Kenya Electricity Generating Company Ltd. (KenGen)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sustainable development calls for the use of sustainable energy systems. However, the way in which a geothermal resource is utilized will ultimately determine whether or not the utilization is sustainable. Energy usage is set to increase worldwide, and geothermal energy usage for both electricity generation and heating will also increase significantly. The world's geothermal resources will need to be used in a sustainable manner. The sustainable utilization of geothermal energy means that it is produced and used in a way that is compatible with the well-being of future generations and the environment. This paper provides a literature review of the linkages between geothermal energy developments for electricity generation and sustainable development, as well as a review of currently available sustainability assessment frameworks. Significant impacts occur as a result of geothermal energy projects for electricity generation and these impacts may be positive or negative. The need for correct management of such impacts through a customized sustainability assessment framework is identified and the foundation for sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy development is built in this paper. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available