4.7 Article

Geological model of the central Periadriatic basin (Apennines, Italy)

Journal

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 107-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.07.005

Keywords

3D modeling; Structural geology; Seismic lines; Seismic stratigraphy; Fold-and-thrust belt; Anticlines; Thrust basin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D geological models from multi-source data (cross-sections, geological maps, borehole logs and outcrops) are a critical tool to improve the interpretation of the spatial organization of subsurface structures that are not directly accessible. In this paper, we reconstruct the main geological structures and surfaces in three dimensions through the interpolation of closely and regularly spaced 2D seismic sections, constrained by wells data and surface geology. The methodology was applied in the Marche-Abruzzi sector of the Periadriatic basin, where the more external part of the Apennines fold-and-thrust belt is mostly buried under a syn- and post-orogenic, Plio-Pleistocene, siliciclastic sequence. The 3D model allowed us to correlate the main thrust fronts and related anticlines along strike, revealing a general ramp flat ramp trajectory characterizing the main structural trends. This geometric organization influences the sequence of thrust-system propagation and characterizes the evolution of syntectonic basins. The obtained 3D model points out several variation occurring along strike: i) main trends geometric relationships; ii) deformation chronology and iii) displacement distribution. In the northern sector, higher displacement and structural elevation are reached out by the Nereto-Bellante structure, whereas in the southern sector the Villadegna-Costiera Structure is the prevalent. All structures show a diachronic thrusts activity along strike, younger toward the north. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available