4.7 Article

In-situ gas hydrate hydrate saturation estimated from various well logs at the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope

Journal

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 439-449

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.06.007

Keywords

Gas hydrate; Saturation; Mount Elbert; Well logs; Rock physics model

Funding

  1. U. S. Geological Survey
  2. U. S. Department of Energy [DE-AI21-92MC29214]
  3. U. S. Bureau of Land Management [LAI-02-0015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2006, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) completed detailed analysis and interpretation of available 2-D and 3-D seismic data and proposed a viable method for identifying sub-permafrost gas hydrate prospects within the gas hydrate stability zone in the Milne Point area of northern Alaska. To validate the predictions of the USGS and to acquire critical reservoir data needed to develop a long-term production testing program, a well was drilled at the Mount Elbert prospect in February, 2007. Numerous well log data and cores were acquired to estimate in-situ gas hydrate saturations and reservoir properties. Gas hydrate saturations were estimated from various well logs such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), P- and S-wave velocity, and electrical resistivity logs along with pore-water salinity. Gas hydrate saturations from the NMR log agree well with those estimated from P- and S-wave velocity data. Because of the low salinity of the connate water and the low formation temperature, the resistivity of connate water is comparable to that of shale. Therefore, the effect of clay should be accounted for to accurately estimate gas hydrate saturations from the resistivity data. Two highly gas hydrate-saturated intervals are identified - an upper similar to 43 ft zone with an average gas hydrate saturation of 54% and a lower similar to 53 ft zone with an average gas hydrate saturation of 50%; both zones reach a maximum of about 75% saturation. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available