4.7 Article

The limited suitability of silica diagenetic boundaries as isothermal markers: Insights from seismic reflection imaging, Offshore Sakhalin, Russian Far East

Journal

MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 1028-1039

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.12.006

Keywords

Silica diagenesis; Opal-A; Opal-CT; Diagenetic boundaries; Isotherms; Sakhalin

Funding

  1. NERC [NER/S/C/2005/14376]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many sedimentary basins the seismic reflections that mark the conversion of opal-A to opal-CT and the subsequent conversion of opal-CT to quartz, are parallel to the present-day seabed. As the reactions are in part thermally activated these boundaries have been proposed as potential isothermal markers and could have utility for hydrocarbon exploration. We describe opal-A to opal-CT and opal-CT to quartz diagenetic boundaries using 2D seismic data from the North Sakhalin Basin (NSB). These are not parallel to the present-day seabed, but for 80% of the area of the basin are parallel to an unconformity of Late Miocene age and may represent palaeo-isotherms that were parallel to the Late Miocene seabed. This characteristic has been identified in other basins and may indicate silica diagenetic boundaries do not make reliable present-day isothermal boundaries. We propose diagenetic boundaries, which are not parallel to the seabed, are not present-day isothermal boundaries. This characteristic could result from: (1) temperature decrease, such as through a declining geothermal gradient or erosion of the overburden, which will cause the rate of conversion to slow; (2) variations in the burial rate that would cause changes to the rate of conversion; and (3) a change in the rate of conversion as a result of variation in the physicochemical factors influencing the silica diagenetic reactions. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available