4.4 Article

Benthic algal biomass and assemblage changes following environmental flow releases and unregulated tributary flows downstream of a major storage

Journal

MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 12, Pages 1059-1071

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/MF13225

Keywords

cobble; diatoms; filamentous; riffle; river; scour; stimulus; velocity

Funding

  1. NSW Office of Water, through the Environmental Flows Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A large dam reducing the magnitude of flows regulates the Severn River, Australia. Environmental flows (EFs) are designed to increase the magnitude of flow and improve ecological outcomes such as reducing filamentous algal biomass and re-setting algal succession. The effectiveness of EF releases to alter benthic algal assemblages is poorly understood. We examined benthic algal biomass and assemblage structure at two cobble-dominated riffle sites downstream of Pindari Dam, before and after two EFs. Both EFs had discharges of similar to 11.6m(3)s(-1) (velocity of similar to 0.9ms(-1)). Neither EF reduced benthic algal biomass, and sometimes led to increases, with density of some filamentous algae increasing (Stigeoclonium and Leptolyngbya). An unregulated flow from a tributary between the two sites increased discharge to 25.2m(3)s(-1) (velocity of similar to 1.2ms(-1)), decreasing biomass and density of filamentous algae. The similarity in flow velocities between scouring and non-scouring events suggests that thresholds may exist and/or suspended sediments carried from unregulated tributaries may contribute to reduce algal biomass. Identifying velocities needed to reduce algal biomass are useful. Accordingly, EFs with flow velocities similar to 1.2ms(-1) may achieve this in river cobble-dominated riffle sections dominated by filamentous algae. Lower flow velocities of <0.9ms(-1) may result in no change or an increase in filamentous algae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available