4.4 Article

Temporal dynamics in coral bioindicators for water quality on coastal coral reefs of the Great Barrier Reef

Journal

MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 703-716

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/MF08016

Keywords

benthic irradiance; bioerosion; sea surface temperature; specificity; symbiont density; turbidity

Funding

  1. Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility (MTSRF)
  2. Co-operative Research Centre (CRC)
  3. Australian Institute of Marine Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a need to identify effective coral bioindicators that provide quantifiable links between changes in water quality and the condition of coastal coral reefs. Temporal variation in a range of coral bioindicators including symbiont density, concentration of chlorophyll a, skeletal density and colony brightness of Pocillopora damicornis, as well as colony brightness and density of macro-bioeroders of massive Porites spp. was examined for 2 years on a coastal coral reef of the Great Barrier Reef. The specificity to changes in water quality varied among bioindicators. For example, a 2.5-fold variation in symbiont density of P. damicornis was related strongly to mean 14-day sea surface temperature and seasonal changes in water quality, suggesting medium specificity to changes in water quality. In contrast, the density of macro-bioeroders in Porites did not vary seasonally but there were consistently more macro-bioeroders at the coastal than mid-shelf reference locations, suggesting high specificity of spatial differences in water quality. In situ measurements of benthic irradiance and turbidity allowed the quantification of potential stress thresholds for coastal corals. Our data suggest long-term turbidity > 3 NTU leads to sublethal stress, whereas long-term turbidity > 5 NTU corresponds to severe stress effects on corals at shallow depths.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available