4.4 Article

Association of reduced riparian vegetation cover in agricultural landscapes with coarse detritus dynamics in lowland streams

Journal

MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH
Volume 59, Issue 11, Pages 998-1014

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/MF08012

Keywords

allochthonous input; canopy cover; coarse particulate organic matter; Eucalyptus camaldulensis; litter trap

Funding

  1. Monash University
  2. Co-operative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology
  3. Murray-Darling Basin Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies were conducted on streams flowing through agricultural floodplains in south-eastern Australia to quantify whether reductions in riparian canopy cover were associated with alterations to the input and benthic standing stocks of coarse allochthonous detritus. Comparisons were made among three farmland reaches and three reaches within reserves with intact cover of remnant overstorey trees. Detritus inputs to these reaches were measured monthly over 2 years using litter traps. Direct inputs to streams within the reserves were relatively high (550-617 g ash free dry weight (AFDW) m(-2) year(-1)), but were lower at farmland reaches with the lowest canopy covers (83-117 gAFDW m(-2) year(-1)). Only a minor fraction of the total allochthonous input (<10%) entered any of the study reaches laterally. The mean amounts of benthic detritus were lowest in the most open farmland reaches. Standing stocks of benthic detritus were found to be highly patchy across a large number of agricultural streams, but were consistently very low where the streamside canopy cover was below similar to 35%. Canopy cover should be restored along cleared agricultural streams because allochthonous detritus is a major source of food and habitat for aquatic ecosystems. Given the absence of pristine lowland streams in south-eastern Australia, those reaches with the most intact remnant overstorey canopies should be used to guide restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available