4.0 Article

Restricting feed ration has more effect than diet type on the feeding behaviour of greenlip abalone Haliotis laevigata

Journal

MARINE AND FRESHWATER BEHAVIOUR AND PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 51-70

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10236244.2014.990701

Keywords

Haliotis laevigata; greenlip abalone; feed ration; macroalgae; formulated diet; novel video monitoring; aquaculture; feeding behaviour

Funding

  1. South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI)
  2. Marine Innovation Southern Australia (MISA)
  3. Australian Abalone Growers' Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Abalone farmed in Australia are predominantly fed formulated feeds, while in the wild, their diet consists of a mix of macroalgae. Here we investigated the feeding behaviour of juvenile greenlip abalone, Haliotis laevigata; fed live macroalgae and formulated diets at different rations; and observed their feeding behaviour using a novel ventral video monitoring technique. Four different diets (commercial chip, experimental flake, Ulva sp. and Gracilaria cliftonii) at two feeding rations (excess vs. restricted) were tested. Diet type had no effect on abalone movement, but macroalgal diets resulted in higher feed intakes. Restricting feed rations induced greater movement. Abalone moved little during the light period and moved mostly during darkness, except for animals on the restricted feed ration where feeding commenced during the light period. On farms, this phenomenon may be a useful behavioural indicator for identifying underfed abalone. Despite their lower intake, formulated diets promoted higher energy and nutritional intake, indicating that quantity of feed consumed is not solely indicative of nutritional gain. From a research perspective, the novel ventral monitoring method has created opportunities for further behavioural studies in molluscs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available