3.9 Article

The Spineangel®: Examining the validity and reliability of a novel clinical device for monitoring trunk motion

Journal

MANUAL THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 160-166

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2009.10.002

Keywords

Trunk; Flexion; Extension; Spineangel (R) device; Validity; Reliability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spinal loading in excessive and repeated trunk flexion may hinder recovery from acute low back pain. The Spineangel (R) device provides real-time patient biofeedback on trunk flexion and may facilitate recovery from lower back injury. This cross-sectional study evaluates validity and reliability of this device in the laboratory setting. Participants included IS healthy males. Angular displacements were simultaneously obtained from a Spineangel (R) device placed on the hip and criterion measures of hip, lumbar and total sagittal rotation, and pelvic tilt obtained via 3D Motion Analysis (R). Each participant repeated four movements five times in a random order (forward bending fingertips-to-knees and to mid-lower leg, full flexion, and full extension). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for Spineangel (R) measurement of trunk motion were excellent (ICC > 0.9). The coefficient of repeatability was less than 5.21 in both flexion and extension. Spineangel (R) showed the highest correlation with Motion Analysis (R) measurement of pelvic tilt with no statistical difference between measures when bending forward to fingertips-to-knees. Given its high reliability, the Spineangel (R) device has potential as a trunk flexion biofeedback device. Further investigation is required to see if these laboratory results can be reproduced in the clinical setting and to determine the clinical benefits of such a device. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available