3.9 Article

Relationships between prolonged neck/shoulder pain and sitting spinal posture in male and female adolescents

Journal

MANUAL THERAPY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 321-329

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2008.04.004

Keywords

Neck pain; Neck/shoulder pain; Sitting postured; Gender; Adolescents

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [4323200]
  2. Raine Foundation at the University of Western Australia, Healthway
  3. Arthritis Foundation of Australia
  4. Arthritis Foundation of Western Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neck/shoulder pain (NSP) is a common problem for adolescents and posture has been Suggested as ail important risk factor. The aim of this cross sectional study was to examine the relationship between prolonged NSP and habitual sitting Posture in adolescents. The habitual Sitting postures of 1593, 14-year-old adolescents with and Without prolonged NSP were assessed using sagittal plane digital photographs. Cervicothoracic and lumbopelvic posture angles were calculated from the digital images using motion analysis software. Adolescents reported experience of NSP by questionnaire. Differences between postures of males and females and those with and without prolonged NSP were examined using independent t-tests. The relationships between cervicothoracic and lumbopelvic Postures and presence of prolonged NSP were investigated using logistic regression models controlling for gender. Prolonged NSP was reported by 5.3% of the adolescents, with females reporting a higher prevalence rate (6.5%) than males (4.2%). Females also sat more erect with it more lordotic lumbar posture than males. Adolescents with prolonged NSP had more flexed cervicothoracic posture, more erect trunk and more lumbar lordosis. When gender was controlled, only lumbar lordosis was related to the presence of prolonged NSP. Crown Copyright (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available