Journal
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages 2-20Publisher
INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1413
Keywords
natural experiment; game show; prisoner's dilemma; cooperation; cooperative behavior; social behavior; social preferences; reciprocity; reciprocal behavior; context effects; anchoring
Funding
- Erasmus Research Institute of Management
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
- Tinbergen Institute
Ask authors/readers for more resources
We examine cooperative behavior when large sums of money are at stake, using data from the television game show Golden Balls. At the end of each episode, contestants play a variant on the classic prisoner's dilemma for large and widely ranging stakes averaging over $20,000. Cooperation is surprisingly high for amounts that would normally be considered consequential but look tiny in their current context, what we call a big peanuts phenomenon. Utilizing the prior interaction among contestants, we find evidence that people have reciprocal preferences. Surprisingly, there is little support for conditional cooperation in our sample. That is, players do not seem to be more likely to cooperate if their opponent might be expected to cooperate. Further, we replicate earlier findings that males are less cooperative than females, but this gender effect reverses for older contestants because men become increasingly cooperative as their age increases.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available