4.2 Article

Population density and abundance of sympatric large carnivores in the lowland tropical evergreen forest of Indian Eastern Himalayas

Journal

MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 254-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2014.03.002

Keywords

Large carnivores; Capture-recapture; Repeated count; Relative abundance index; Eastern Himalaya

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology
  2. Rufford Small Grant Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Low density occurrence of large carnivore species and direct hunting of predators and prey make carnivore conservation complex. Vital baseline information on population status of large carnivores is still deficient in most forests of eastern Himalaya, which are known to be the biodiversity hotspots. To fill this information gap, we estimated the large carnivore population status and abundance in an intricate eastern Himalayan lowland tropical forest in Pakke Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh. Population status and abundance estimates of tigers and leopards were made through individual identification using closed capture-recapture sampling. To estimate the dhole abundance photographic encounter rate was used. For individually non-identifiable species photographic rate seemed to correlate well with animal abundance. The estimated tiger and leopard density through 1/2 MMDM was 2.14 +/- 0.04/100 km(2) and 2.99 +/- 1.13/100 km(2) respectively. Maximum likelihood estimates shows density of tiger 1.86 +/- 0.7 and for leopard 2.82 +/- 1.2.The estimated dhole abundance was (N) 10.6 +/- 0.94, and density 6.62 +/- 0.58 individuals in 100 km(2). Further, occupancy estimation of large carnivores may be tried along with assessing the comparative efficacy of other population estimation methods to establish better monitoring methods for this region. (C) 2014 Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Saugetierkunde. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available