4.7 Article

Deriving scaling factors using a global hydrological model to restore GRACE total water storage changes for China's Yangtze River Basin

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 177-193

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.003

Keywords

GRACE; Scaling factor; PCR-GLOBWB; CLM4.0; GLDAS-1 Noah; Yangtze River; China

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China Major Research Programs [91437214, 71461010701]
  2. Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering at Tsinghua University [sklhse-2014-A-02, sklhse-2014-A-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used a global hydrological model (GHM), PCR-GLOBWB, which simulates surface water storage changes, natural and human induced groundwater storage changes, and the interactions between surface water and subsurface water, to generate scaling factors by mimicking low-pass filtering of GRACE signals. Signal losses in GRACE data were subsequently restored by the scaling factors from PCR-GLOBWB. Results indicate greater spatial heterogeneity in scaling factor from PCR-GLOBWB and CLM4.0 than that from GLDAS-1 Noah due to comprehensive simulation of surface and subsurface water storage changes for PCR-GLOBWB and CLM4.0. Filtered GRACE total water storage (TWS) changes applied with PCR-GLOBWB scaling factors show closer agreement with water budget estimates of TWS changes than those with scaling factors from other land surface models (LSMs) in China's Yangtze River basin. Results of this study develop a further understanding of the behavior of scaling factors from different LSMs or GHMs over hydrologically complex basins, and could be valuable in providing more accurate TWS changes for hydrological applications (e.g., monitoring drought and groundwater storage depletion) over regions where human-induced interactions between surface water and subsurface water are intensive. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available