4.5 Article

Wave-CAIPI for highly accelerated 3D imaging

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 73, Issue 6, Pages 2152-2162

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25347

Keywords

parallel imaging; CAIPIRINHA; quantitative susceptibility mapping; phase imaging

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R00EB012107, P41RR14075]
  2. National Institutes of Health Blueprint for Neuroscience [1U01MH093765]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo introduce the wave-CAIPI (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging) acquisition and reconstruction technique for highly accelerated 3D imaging with negligible g-factor and artifact penalties. MethodsThe wave-CAIPI 3D acquisition involves playing sinusoidal gy and gz gradients during the readout of each kx encoding line while modifying the 3D phase encoding strategy to incur interslice shifts as in 2D-CAIPI acquisitions. The resulting acquisition spreads the aliasing evenly in all spatial directions, thereby taking full advantage of 3D coil sensitivity distribution. By expressing the voxel spreading effect as a convolution in image space, an efficient reconstruction scheme that does not require data gridding is proposed. Rapid acquisition and high-quality image reconstruction with wave-CAIPI is demonstrated for high-resolution magnitude and phase imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping. ResultsWave-CAIPI enables full-brain gradient echo acquisition at 1 mm isotropic voxel size and R=3 x 3 acceleration with maximum g-factors of 1.08 at 3T and 1.05 at 7T. Relative to the other advanced Cartesian encoding strategies (2D-CAIPI and bunched phase encoding) wave-CAIPI yields up to two-fold reduction in maximum g-factor for nine-fold acceleration at both field strengths. ConclusionWave-CAIPI allows highly accelerated 3D acquisitions with low artifact and negligible g-factor penalties, and may facilitate clinical application of high-resolution volumetric imaging. Magn Reson Med 73:2152-2162, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available