4.5 Article

Improved Volume Selective 1H MR Spectroscopic Imaging of the Prostate with Gradient Offset Independent Adiabaticity Pulses at 3 Tesla

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 915-924

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25476

Keywords

spectroscopic imaging; semi-LASER; adiabatic pulses; GOIA; prostate

Funding

  1. EU Marie Curie project FAST [MRTN-CT-2006-035801]
  2. Dutch Cancer Society [KUN 2007/3971]
  3. Siemens Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Volume selection in H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) of the prostate is commonly performed with low-bandwidth refocusing pulses. However, their large chemical shift displacement error (CSDE) causes lipid signal contamination in the spectral range of interest. Application of high-bandwidth adiabatic pulses is limited by radiofrequency (RF) power deposition. In this study, we aimed to provide an MRSI sequence that overcomes these limitations. Methods: Measurements were performed at 3 T with an endorectal receive coil. A semi-LASER sequence was equipped with low RF power demanding gradient-modulated offset-independent adiabaticity (GOIA) refocusing pulses with WURST(16,4) modulation, with a 10 kHz bandwidth. Results: Simulations and phantom studies verified that the GOIA pulses select slices with a flat top and sharp edges and minimal CSDE. The sequence timing was tuned to an optimal citrate signal shape at an echo time of 88 ms. Patient studies (n = 10) demonstrated that high quality spectra with reduced lipid artifacts can be obtained from the whole prostate. Compared with PRESS acquisition at 145 ms the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of citrate is increased up to 2.6 and choline up to 1.3. Conclusion: An MRSI sequence of the prostate is presented with minimized spectral lipid contamination and improved SNR, to facilitate routine clinical acquisition of metabolic data. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available