4.5 Article

Efficient Generation of T2*-Weighted Contrast by Interslice Echo-Shifting for Human Functional and Anatomical Imaging at 9.4 Tesla

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 74, Issue 6, Pages 1698-1704

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25570

Keywords

echo-shifting; T-2*; ultrahigh field; susceptibility-weighted images; fMRI

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Alliance ICEMED - Imaging and Curing Environmental Metabolic Diseases through the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Standard gradient-echo sequences are often prohibitively slow for T-2*-weighted imaging as long echo times prolong the repetition time of the sequence. Echo-shifting offers a way out of this dilemma by allowing an echo time that exceeds the repetition time. The purpose of this work is to present a gradient-echo sequence that is optimized for multislice T-2*-weighted imaging applications by combining echo-shifting with an interleaved slice excitation order. Theory and Methods: This combined approach offers two major advantages: First, it combines the advantages of both concepts, that is, echo time and pulse repetition time can be significantly increased without affecting scan time. Second, there is no echo-shifting related signal loss associated with this concept as only a single radiofrequency pulse is applied per pulse repetition time and slice. Results: A 9.4 Tesla high-resolution T-2*-weighted anatomical brain scan of the proposed sequence is compared to a standard gradient-echo. Furthermore, results from 9.4 Tesla blood oxygen level dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging experiments with an in-plane resolution of 0.8 x 0.8 mm(2) are presented. Conclusion: The proposed sequence allows for efficient generation of T-2*-weighted contrast by combining echo-shifting with an interleaved slice excitation order. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available