4.5 Article

High-Resolution Reduced Field of View Diffusion Tensor Imaging Using Spatially Selective RF Pulses

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1668-1679

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25092

Keywords

MRI; diffusion; white matter imaging; ultra-high resolution; RF pulse design; pulse sequence design

Funding

  1. NLM NIH HHS [T15 LM007359] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeDiffusion tensor imaging (DTI) plays a vital role in identifying white matter fiber bundles. Achievable imaging resolution and imaging time demands remain the major challenges in detecting small fiber bundles with current clinical DTI sequences. MethodsA novel reduced field of view ultra-high-resolution DTI technique named eZOOM (elliptically refocused zonally oblique multislice) was developed. A small circular disk was imaged using spatially selective radiofrequency (RF) pulses, reducing the imaging matrix size. The frequency profile of the spectral-spatial refocusing RF pulse provided intrinsic fat suppression, eliminating the need for fat saturation pulses. ResultsMultislice DTI at a resolution of 0.35 x 0.35 mm in a celery fiber phantom was successfully performed by scanning an 8-cm field of view at 3T. An adequate diffusion-to-noise ratio (DNR >20) was achieved for a 25-min acquisition using a direct-sampling RF receiver. Human subjects (n=7) were scanned at resolutions of 0.47 x 0.47 mm having a DNR <20 within a 75-min scanning time, requiring further enhancements to increase the signal-to-noise ratio. ConclusionsThe new eZOOM-DTI method offers multislice DTI at ultra-high imaging resolutions substantially exceeding those available with current echo-planar DTI techniques. Parallel and fast spin echo methods can be combined with eZOOM to improve SNR and DNR in humans. Magn Reson Med 72:1668-1679, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available