4.5 Article

Time-Resolved TOF MR Angiography in Mice Using a Prospective 3D Radial Double Golden Angle Approach

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages 984-994

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25201

Keywords

TOF angiography; 3D radial; time-resolved; golden angle; temporal filter; small animals

Funding

  1. Translational Research and Advanced Imaging Laboratory - French National Research Agency's Investments for the Future Program (NewFISP) [ANR-10-LABX-57]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo develop an undersampled anatomical, three-dimensional (3-D) time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) method for small animals based on time-of-flight (TOF) effect and radial sampling. MethodsMouse carotid arteries and Circle of Willis images were acquired on a 7T scanner with an electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered sequence. Preliminary experiments were used to generate an approximately uniform distribution of radial projections with a first golden angle and to produce anatomical TOF images. A second golden angle ratio between consecutive projections of cine acquisitions was added to make it possible to use a temporal filter during reconstruction of time-resolved angiography. A decreasing number of projections were tested, and their impact on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spatial resolution was assessed. ResultsIn anatomical MRA, the undersampled radial approach efficiently allows fast acquisition of mouse angiogram in 3D (22 sec). It was also only slightly sensitive to motion and flow artifacts. The time-resolved sequence can be performed with only 2,500 projections per cine and a temporal resolution under 4 ms in a relatively short acquisition time (less than 5 min). ConclusionThis technique simultaneously provided high 3D isotropic spatial resolution and excellent temporal resolution with a good SNR level, allowing blood flow to be visualized in a restricted acquisition time. Magn Reson Med 73:984-994, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available