4.5 Article

Single acquisition electrical property mapping based on relative coil sensitivities: A proof-of-concept demonstration

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages 185-195

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25399

Keywords

quantitative imaging; conductivity; permittivity; coil sensitivities

Funding

  1. SNF [205321_132821]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [205321_132821] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeAll methods presented to date to map both conductivity and permittivity rely on multiple acquisitions to compute quantitatively the magnitude of radiofrequency transmit fields, B-1(+). In this work, we propose a method to compute both conductivity and permittivity based solely on relative receive coil sensitivities (B-1(-)) that can be obtained in one single measurement without the need to neither explicitly perform transmit/receive phase separation nor make assumptions regarding those phases. Theory and MethodsTo demonstrate the validity and the noise sensitivity of our method we used electromagnetic finite differences simulations of a 16-channel transceiver array. To experimentally validate our methodology at 7 Tesla, multi compartment phantom data was acquired using a standard 32-channel receive coil system and two-dimensional (2D) and 3D gradient echo acquisition. The reconstructed electric properties were correlated to those measured using dielectric probes. ResultsThe method was demonstrated both in simulations and in phantom data with correlations to both the modeled and bench measurements being close to identity. The noise properties were modeled and understood. ConclusionThe proposed methodology allows to quantitatively determine the electrical properties of a sample using any MR contrast, with the only constraint being the need to have 4 or more receive coils and high SNR. Magn Reson Med 74:185-195, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available