4.5 Article

Effect of Respiration on the B0 Field in the Human Spinal Cord at 3T

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages 1629-1636

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25075

Keywords

field map; respiration; spinal cord; magnetic susceptibility; shimming

Funding

  1. SensoriMotor Rehabilitation Research Team of the Canadian Institute of Health Research
  2. National MS Society [FG1892A1/1]
  3. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante
  4. Quebec BioImaging Network
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeRespiration affects the bulk magnetic susceptibility, causing frequency shifts as shown in the brain at 7T. Due to the close proximity of the spine to the lungs, this effect is expected to be even larger in the spinal cord, resulting in detrimental B-0 offset. The goal of this study was to quantify the effect of respiration on B-0 variation in the spinal cord. MethodsSeven healthy subjects were scanned at 3T. Field maps were acquired during inspired and expired conditions. Frequency shift was quantified in the brain, brainstem, and cervico-thoracic spinal cord. A skewed Gaussian function with linear term was fitted to the frequency shift as a function of z-location along the spine. ResultsLarge frequency shifts were measured along the cord, with a maximum of 74 Hz at C7 (P<0.05), corresponding to 0.58 ppm. The proposed model was adequately fitted to the respiratory-induced frequency-shifts (adjusted R-2=0.9954). The morphology of subjects (weight and height) seemed to have an impact on the amplitude of frequency shift, although correlations were not significant. ConclusionsThis study provides a deeper understanding of the contribution of respiration to B-0 shift in the spinal cord. The proposed model can be useful for designing future hardware or software strategies to compensate for these B-0 variations dynamically. Magn Reson Med 72:1629-1636, 2014. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available