4.5 Article

Feasibility of Electric Property Tomography of Pelvic Tumors at 3T

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages 1505-1513

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25276

Keywords

electric property tomography; conductivity; electrical conductivity; dielectric properties; hyperthermia treatment planning

Funding

  1. Dutch Cancer Society [UVA 2010 4660]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeInvestigation of the validity of the transceive phase assumption for Electric Property Tomography of pelvic tumors at 3T. The acquired electric conductivities of pelvic tumors are beneficial for improved specific absorption rate determination in hyperthermia treatment planning. MethodsElectromagnetic simulations and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of a pelvic-sized phantom and the human pelvis of a volunteer and a cervix cancer patient. ResultsThe reconstructed conductivity values of the phantom tumor model are in good quantitative agreement (mean deviation: 1-10%) with the probe measurements. Furthermore, the average reconstructed conductivity of a pelvic tumor model was in close agreement with the input conductivity (0.86 S/m vs. 0.90 S/m). The reconstructed tumor conductivity of the presented patient (cervical carcinoma, Stage: IVA) was 1.160.40 S/m. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of electric property tomography to measure quantitatively the conductivity of centrally located tumors in a pelvic-sized phantom and human pelvis with a standard magnetic resonance (MR) system and MR sequences. A good quantitative agreement was found between the reconstructed sigma-values and probe measurements for a wide range of sigma-values and for off-axis located spherical compartment. As most pelvic tumors are located in the central region of the pelvis, these results can be exploited in hyperthermia treatment planning systems. Magn Reson Med 73:1505-1513, 2015. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available