4.5 Article

Phase Reconstruction from Multiple Coil Data Using a Virtual Reference Coil

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 563-569

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24932

Keywords

MRI; phased array; image combination; noise correlation

Funding

  1. NIH [R01s CA134599, EB013433, DC011497]
  2. Siemens Medical Solutions
  3. Cumming Foundation
  4. Ben B. and Iris M. Margolis Foundation
  5. Mark H. Huntsman Endowed Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study develops a method to obtain optimal estimates of absolute magnetization phase from multiple-coil MRI data. Theory and Methods: The element-specific phases of a multi-element receiver coil array are accounted for by using the phase of a real or virtual reference coil that is sensitive over the entire imaged volume. The virtual-reference coil is generated as a weighted combination of measurements from all receiver coils. The phase-corrected multiple coil complex images are combined using the inverse covariance matrix. These methods are tested on images of an agar phantom, an in vivo breast, and an anesthetized rabbit obtained using combinations of four, nine, and three receiver channels, respectively. Results: The four-and three-channel acquisitions require formation of a virtual-reference receiver coil while one channel of the nine-channel receive array has a sensitivity profile covering the entire imaged volume. Referencing to a real or virtual coil gives receiver phases that are essentially identical except for the individual receiver channel noise. The resulting combined images, which account for receiver channel noise covariance, show the expected reduction in phase variance. Conclusion: The proposed virtual reference coil method determines a phase distribution for each coil from which an optimal phase map can be obtained. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available