4.5 Article

Information Theoretic Ranking of Four Models of Diffusion Attenuation in Fresh and Fixed Prostate Tissue Ex Vivo

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 1418-1426

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25032

Keywords

diffusion; prostate; modelling; Akaike Information Criterion

Funding

  1. Australian NHMRC [APP1026467]
  2. Australian National Imaging Facility
  3. EPSRC [EP/E007748, EP/H046410/01]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H046410/1, EP/G007748/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/G007748/1, EP/H046410/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo compare the theoretical information content of four popular models of diffusion-weighted signal attenuation. MethodFour whole prostates were imaged fresh unfixed and fixed at 9.4T. Biexponential, kurtosis, stretched exponential, and monoexponential models were ranked using Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) with validation by a leave-one-out test of model prediction error. ResultsFor unfixed tissue measurements (b-value range: 17-2104 s/mm(2)) the biexponential and kurtosis models had similar information content to each other and this was distinctly higher than for the stretched and monoexponential models. In fixed-tissue measurements (b-value range: 17-8252 s/mm(2)), the biexponential model had much higher information content than the three other models. ConclusionAIC-based model ranking is consistent with an independent prediction accuracy test. Biexponential and kurtosis models consistently perform better than stretched and monoexponential models. The biexponential model has increasing superiority over all three other models as maximum b-value increases above approximate to 2000 s/mm(2). Magn Reson Med 72:1418-1426, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available