4.5 Article

The Hanes-Woolf Linear QUESP Method Improves the Measurements of Fast Chemical Exchange Rates with CEST MRI

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 71, Issue 4, Pages 1603-1612

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24792

Keywords

chemical exchange saturation transfer; MRI; chemical exchange rates; Bloch; QUEST; QUESP; omega plot

Funding

  1. NIH [9R01 CA169774-01, P50 CA5060]
  2. Phoenix Friends of the Arizona Cancer Center
  3. Community Foundation of Southern Arizona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeContrast agents for chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI often require an accurate measurement of the chemical exchange rate. Many analysis methods have been reported that measure chemical exchange rates. Additional analysis methods were derived as part of this study. This report investigated the accuracy and precision of each analysis method. MethodsChemical exchange saturation transfer spectra were simulated using the Bloch-McConnell equations modified for chemical exchange. Chemical exchange saturation transfer spectra of iopromide were obtained with a range of saturation times, saturation powers, and concentrations. These simulated and experimental results were used to estimate the chemical exchange rate using the QUESP, QUEST, Omega Plot (LB-QUESP), EH-QUESP, HW-QUESP, LB-Conc, EH-Conc, and HW-Conc methods. ResultsBloch fitting produced the most precise estimates of chemical exchange rates, although substantial expertise and computation time were required to achieve these results. Of the more simplistic analysis methods, the HW-QUESP method produced the most accurate and precise estimates of fast exchange rates. The QUEST and LB-QUESP methods produced the most accurate estimates of slow exchange rates, especially with samples that have short T-1w relaxation times. ConclusionsHW-QUESP is a simplistic analysis method that should be used when fast chemical exchange rates need to be estimated from chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI results. Magn Reson Med 71:1603-1612, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available