4.5 Article

On the Confounding Effect of Temperature on Chemical Shift-Encoded Fat Quantification

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages 464-470

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24951

Keywords

temperature; fat quantification; proton-density fat-fraction; confounding factors; liver imaging; fat; water imaging

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 DK083380, R01 DK088925]
  2. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF) Accelerator Program
  3. Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR)
  4. GE Healthcare

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To characterize the confounding effect of temperature on chemical shift-encoded (CSE) fat quantification. Methods: The proton resonance frequency of water, unlike triglycerides, depends on temperature. This leads to a temperature dependence of the spectral models of fat (relative to water) that are commonly used by CSE-MRI methods. Simulation analysis was performed for 1.5 Tesla CSE fat-water signals at various temperatures and echo time combinations. Oilwater phantoms were constructed and scanned at temperatures between 0 and 40 degrees C using spectroscopy and CSE imaging at three echo time combinations. An explanted human liver, rejected for transplantation due to steatosis, was scanned using spectroscopy and CSE imaging. Fat-water reconstructions were performed using four different techniques: magnitude and complex fitting, with standard or temperature-corrected signal modeling. Results: In all experiments, magnitude fitting with standard signal modeling resulted in large fat quantification errors. Errors were largest for echo time combinations near TEinit approximate to 1.3 ms, Delta TE approximate to 2.2 ms. Errors in fat quantification caused by temperature-related frequency shifts were smaller with complex fitting, and were avoided using a temperature-corrected signal model. Conclusion: Temperature is a confounding factor for fat quantification. If not accounted for, it can result in large errors in fat quantifications in phantom and ex vivo acquisitions. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available