4.5 Article

Application of Direct Virtual Coil to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and MR Angiography with Data-Driven Parallel Imaging

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 71, Issue 2, Pages 783-789

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24686

Keywords

parallel imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; direct virtual coil; dynamic imaging; coil combination; channel compression

Funding

  1. UW Radiology R&D Committee, NIH, UW School of Medicine and Public Health Wisconsin Partnership Program [NIH-R01 EB006882, NIH R01 DK083380, R01 DK088925, RC1 EB010384]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo demonstrate the feasibility of direct virtual coil (DVC) in the setting of 4D dynamic imaging used in multiple clinical applications. Theory and MethodsThree dynamic imaging applications were chosen: pulmonary perfusion, liver perfusion, and peripheral MR angiography (MRA), with 18, 11, and 10 subjects, respectively. After view-sharing, the k-space data were reconstructed twice: once with channel-by-channel (CBC) followed by sum-of-squares coil combination and once with DVC. Images reconstructed using CBC and DVC were compared and scored based on overall image quality by two experienced radiologists using a five-point scale. ResultsThe CBC and DVC showed similar image quality in image domain. Time course measurements also showed good agreement in the temporal domain. CBC and DVC images were scored as equivalent for all pulmonary perfusion cases, all liver perfusion cases, and four of the 10 peripheral MRA cases. For the remaining six peripheral MRA cases, DVC were scored as slightly better (not clinically significant) than the CBC images by Radiologist A and as equivalent by Radiologist B. ConclusionFor dynamic contrast-enhanced MR applications, it is clinically feasible to reduce image reconstruction time while maintaining image quality and time course measurement using the DVC technique. Magn Reson Med 71:783-789, 2014. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available