4.5 Article

Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging for prostate cancer: An evaluation of perfusion fraction and diffusion coefficient derived from different b-value combinations

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 553-562

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24277

Keywords

IVIM MR imaging; prostate cancer; perfusion fraction; diffusion coefficient; non-Gaussian diffusion; DCE-MRI

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There has been a resurgent interest in intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) MR imaging to obtain perfusion as well as diffusion information on lesions, in which the diffusion was modeled as Gaussian diffusion. However, it was observed that this diffusion deviated from expected monoexponential decay at high b-values and the reported perfusion in prostate is contrary to the findings in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI studies and angiogenesis. Thus, this work is to evaluate the effect of different b-values on IVIM perfusion fractions (f) and diffusion coefficients (D) for prostate cancer detection. The results show that both parameters depended heavily on the b-values, and those derived without the highest b-value correlated best with the results from DCE-MRI studies; specifically, f was significantly elevated (7.2% vs. 3.7%) in tumors when compared with normal tissues, in accordance with the volume transfer constant (Ktrans; 0.39 vs. 0.18 min-1) and plasma fractional volume (vp; 8.4% vs. 3.4%). In conclusion, it is critical to choose an appropriate range of b-values in studies or include the non-Gaussian diffusion contribution to obtain unbiased IVIM measurements. These measurements could eliminate the need for DCE-MRI, which is especially relevant in patients who cannot receive intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media. Magn Reson Med, 2013. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available