4.5 Article

In vivo imaging of vessel diameter, size, and density: A comparative study between MRI and histology

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 69, Issue 1, Pages 18-26

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24218

Keywords

perfusion; brain; microvasculature; USPIO; glioma; MRI

Funding

  1. La Ligue Contre le Cancer
  2. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  3. Institut National du Cancer
  4. Region Rhone-Alpes
  5. Canceropole Lyon Auvergne Rhone-Alpes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histological estimates of the mean vessel diameter (mVD), the vessel density (Density), and the vessel size index (VSI) obtained in the same tumor-bearing animals. Twenty-seven rats bearing intracranial glioma (C6 or RG2) were imaged by MRI. Changes in transverse relaxations (?R?2* and R2) were induced by the injection of an iron-based contrast agent and were mapped using a multi gradient-echo spin-echo sequence. Then, brain vascular network was studied ex vivo by histology. Three regions of interest were drawn in apparently normal tissue (neocortex and striatum) and in the tumor. In vivo mVDMRI, DensityMRI, and VSIMRI were measured; ex vivo, mVDhisto, Densityhisto, and VSIhisto were quantified on the same animals. MRI and histology measurements differed by -15 to 26%. A positive correlation was found between MRI and histology for mVD, Density, and VSI counterparts (R2 = 0.62, 0.50, 0.73, respectively; P < 0.001 in all cases). This study indicates that MRI and histology yields well correlated the estimates of mVD, Density, and VSI. VSI is the closest MRI estimate to histology. As Density and mVD or VSI provide complementary information, it is worth computing them to characterize angiogenesis beyond blood volume fraction. Magn Reson Med, 2013. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available