4.5 Article

Radiofrequency Pulse Designs for Three-Dimensional MRI Providing Uniform Tipping in Inhomogeneous B1 Fields

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages 1254-1266

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22913

Keywords

RF pulse; high field; MRI; optimization

Funding

  1. NIH [5R01EB000766, 1P41RR023953]
  2. Center for Imaging of Neurodegenerative Diseases at the San Francisco VA Medical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although high-field MRI offers increased signal-to-noise, the nonuniform tipping produced by conventional radiofrequency (RF) pulses leads to spatially dependent contrast and suboptimal signal-to-noise, thus complicating the interpretation of the MR images. For structural imaging, three-dimensional sequences that do not make use of frequency-selective RF pulses have become popular. Therefore, the aim of this research was to develop non-slice-selective (NSS) RF pulses with immunity to both amplitude of (excitation) RF field (B-1) inhomogeneity and resonance offset. To accomplish this, an optimization routine based on optimal control theory was used to design new NSS pulses with desired ranges of immunity to B1 inhomogeneity and resonance offset. The design allows the phase of transverse magnetization produced by the pulses to vary. Although the emphasis is on shallow tip designs, new designs for 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 180 degrees NSS RF pulses are also provided. These larger tip angle pulses are compared with recently published NSS pulses. Evidence is presented that the pulses presented in this article have equivalent performance but are shorter than the recently published pulses. Although the NSS pulses generate higher specific absorption rates and larger magnetization transfer effects than the rectangular pulses they replace, they nevertheless show promise for three-dimensional MRI experiments at high field. Magn Reson Med 66: 1254-1266, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available