4.5 Article

Size-optimized 32-Channel Brain Arrays for 3 T Pediatric Imaging

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 1777-1787

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22961

Keywords

magnetic resonance imaging; phased-array coil; pediatric imaging; parallel imaging

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01MH093765, P41RR14075, R21EB008547, R21HD058725, R01EB009756, R01NS055754]
  2. Ellison Medical Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Size-optimized 32-channel receive array coils were developed for five age groups, neonates, 6 months old, 1 year old, 4 years old, and 7 years old, and evaluated for pediatric brain imaging. The array consisted of overlapping circular surface coils laid out on a close-fitting coil-former. The two-section coil former design was obtained from surface contours of aligned three-dimensional MRI scans of each age group. Signal-to-noise ratio and noise amplification for parallel imaging were evaluated and compared to two coils routinely used for pediatric brain imaging; a commercially available 32-channel adult head coil and a pediatric-sized birdcage coil. Phantom measurements using the neonate, 6-month-old, 1-year-old, 4-year-old, and 7-year-old coils showed signal-to-noise ratio increases at all locations within the brain over the comparison coils. Within the brain cortex the five dedicated pediatric arrays increased signal-to-noise ratio by up to 3.6-, 3.0-, 2.6-, 2.3-, and 1.7-fold, respectively, compared to the 32-channel adult coil, as well as improved G-factor maps for accelerated imaging. This study suggests that a size-tailored approach can provide significant sensitivity gains for accelerated and unaccelerated pediatric brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 66:1777-1787, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available