4.5 Article

Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat Skeletal Muscle Assessed with T2-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 528-537

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22801

Keywords

pressure ulcers; skeletal muscle; ischemia-reperfusion injury; no-reflow

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW
  2. Applied Science Division of NWO
  3. Ministry of Economic Affairs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pressure ulcers are localized areas of soft tissue breakdown due to mechanical loading. Susceptible individuals are subjected to pressure relief strategies to prevent long loading periods. Therefore, ischemia-reperfusion injury may play an important role in the etiology of pressure ulcers. To investigate the inter-relation between postischemic perfusion and changes in skeletal muscle integrity, the hindlimbs of Brown Norway rats were subjected to 4-h ischemia followed by 2-h reperfusion. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was used to examine perfusion, and changes in skeletal muscle integrity were monitored with T-2-weighted MRI. The dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data showed a heterogeneous postischemic profile in the hindlimb, consisting of areas with increased contrast enhancement (14-76% of the hindlimb) and regions with no-reflow (5-77%). For T-2, a gradual increase in the complete leg was observed during the 4-h ischemic period (from 34 to 41 msec). During the reperfusion phase, a heterogeneous distribution of T-2 was observed. Areas with increased contrast enhancement were associated with a decrease in T-2 (to 38 msec) toward preischemic levels, whereas no-reflow areas exhibited a further increase in T-2 (to 42 msec). These results show that reperlusion after prolonged ischemia may not be complete, thereby continuing the ischemic condition and aggravating tissue damage. Magn Reson Med 66:528-537, 2011. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available