4.5 Article

A New Approach to Autocalibrated Dynamic Parallel Imaging Based on the Karhunen-Loeve Transform: KL-TSENSE and KL-TGRAPPA

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 65, Issue 6, Pages 1786-1792

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22766

Keywords

principal component analysis; parallel imaging; magnetic resonance imaging

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL102450]
  2. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Malvern, PA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TSENSE and TGRAPPA are autocalibrated parallel imaging techniques that can improve the temporal resolution and/or spatial resolution in dynamic magnetic resonance imaging applications. In its original form, TSENSE uses temporal low-pass filtering of the undersampled frames to create the sensitivity map. TGRAPPA uses a sliding-window moving average when finding the autocalibrating signals. Both filtering methods are suboptimal in the least-squares sense and may give rise to mismatches between the undersampled k-space raw data and the corresponding coil sensitivities. Such mismatches may result in aliasing artifacts when imaging patients with heavy breathing, as in real-time imaging of wall motion by MRI following a treadmill exercise stress test. In this study, we demonstrate the use of an optimal linear filter, i.e., the Karhunen-Loeve transform filter, to estimate the channel sensitivity for TSENSE and acquire the autocalibration signals for TGRAPPA. Phantom experiments show that the new reconstruction method has comparable signal-to-noise ratio performance to traditional TSENSE/TGRAPPA reconstruction. In vivo real-time cardiac cine experiments performed in five healthy volunteers post-exercise during rapid respiration show that the new method significantly reduces the chest wall aliasing artifacts caused by respiratory motion (P < 0.001). Magn Reson Med 65:1786-1792, 2011. (C)2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available