4.7 Article

Improved algorithm for routine monitoring of cyanobacteria and eutrophication in inland and near-coastal waters

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 156, Issue -, Pages 374-382

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.010

Keywords

Cyanobacteria; Eutrophication; Chlorophyll-a; Surface scum; Aquatic macrophytes; Trophic status; Water quality; Remote sensing; MERIS; BEAM; Maximum peak height

Funding

  1. ESA's Diversity II project
  2. EU-FP-7 Marie Curie PEOPLE/IAPP project 'WaterS' (WaterS - EU REA Grant) [251527]
  3. ESA's Diversity II project (Diversity II) [ESRIN/AO/1-7025/12/I-LG]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This short communication describes several previously undocumented processing steps, pixel flagging procedures, and improvements made to the maximum peak height (MPH) algorithm, which is aimed at the operational detection of chlorophyll a (chl-a) and cyanobacteria blooms in inland and near-coastal waters. The improvements reduce false-positive cyanobacteria detection in oligotrophic waters; enable pixels in clear waters affected by environmental radiances (stray light) to be identified; and enhance detection of floating aquatic vegetation. Several case studies from around the globe are used to illustrate these improvements, and demonstrate new pixel flagging procedures and algorithm operation. The algorithm was validated using a large in situ dataset for chl-a from a wide range of inland water types. The MPH chl-a estimates were more stable than the fluorescence line height (FLH) and maximum chlorophyll index (MCI) values. The results demonstrate the potential for using the MPH algorithm, now released as a plug-in for the Basic ENVISAT A(ATSR) and MERE (BEAM) processing toolbox, as a standard product for estimating chl-a (and trophic status) in inland and near-coastal waters using MERIS and the forthcoming Sentinel-3 Ocean and Land Colour Instrument. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available